1. Home
  2. Volume 26 Nomor 2, 2023
  3. Shali

AN ANALYSIS OF CYLINDRICAL BORIS SOLVER FOR TYPICAL PARAMETERS OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL PENNING ION SOURCE SIMULATION

Ahsani Hafizhu Shali(1), Ahmad Hasan As'ari(2),


(1) Research Center for Accelerator Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
(2) Research Center for Advanced Materials, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
Corresponding Author

Abstract


The cylindrical Boris solver is analyzed for typical two-dimensional Penning ion source simulation parameters. The analysis comprises the solver's accuracy and stability, especially for the latter simulation stages, typically after about 30 μs. The simulation is done for two cases; the first is a gyration simulation with a homogenous magnetic field, and the second uses the same setup as the Penning simulation. Several investigated quantities to determine the error are the radial position, axial position, and velocity magnitude (or kinetic energy). The error is calculated by comparing the result with the reference result from the exact solver with an incredibly small time step width, dt = 10-15  s. The result shows a discrepancy between cylindrical and cartesian Boris solvers. The velocity magnitude of the particle decays as time goes on for the cylindrical Boris solver, especially when the particle is close to the z-axis, an error not found on the cartesian solver. For typical Penning simulation parameters, the trajectory of individual particles is way off the reference trajectory. However, the mean position is relatively close to the reference compared to the dimension of the simulation domain. The kinetic energy is also relatively accurate, with a similar slow decay related to the deteriorating non-axial velocity components previously observed in the first case. Thus, for the simultaneous simulation of millions of particles, there should not be any significant observable difference in actual Penning simulation compared to Penning simulation with reference time step width.

Keywords


Cylindrical Boris solver,;Penningion ion source; simulation

References


  1. H. Qin, et. al. Why is Boris Algorithm so Good?, Physics of Plasmas 20, 084503 (2013); doi: 10.1063/1.4818428.
  2. S. Zenitani and T. Umeda, On The Boris Solver in Particle-in-cell Simulation, Physics of Plasmas 25, 112110 (2018); doi: 10.1063/1.5051077.
  3. P. H. Stoltz, et. al., Efficiency of a Boris-like integration scheme with spatial stepping, Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams 5, 094001 (2002); doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.5.094001.
  4. X. S. Wei, et. al., Method to Integrate Full Particle Orbit in Toroidal Plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 22, 092502 (2015); doi: 10.1063/1.4929799.
  5. Silakhuddin and S. Santosa, Conceptual Design Study of 13 MeV Proton Cyclotron, Jurnal Atom Indonesia 38, 1 (2012).
  6. I. G. Brown, The Physics and Technology of Ion Sources Second Edition, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & co. KGaA, 2004.
  7. J. L. Rovey, B. P. Ruzic, and T. J. Houlahan, Simple Penning Ion Source for Laboratory Research and Development, Review of Scientific Instruments 78, 106101 (2007); doi: 10.1063/1.2791983.
  8. M. R. N. Abadi, et. al., Simulation and Optimization of a Negative Hydrogen Penning Ion Source, Physics of Plasmas 25, 123501 (2018); doi: 10.1063/1.5020224.
  9. C. K. Birdsall and A. B. Langdon, Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation, McGraw-Hill, 1985.
  10. G. L. Delzanno and E. Camporeale, On Particle Movers in Cylindrical Geometry for Particle-in-Cell Simulations, Journal of Computational Physics 253 (2013); doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.07.007.
  11. J. P. Boris, Relativistic Plasma Simulation - Optimization of a Hybrid Code, Proc. 4th on Numerical Simulation of Plasmas, 1970.
  12. B. Ripperda, et. al., A Comprehensive Comparison of Relativistic Particle Integrators, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 235, 21 (2018); doi: 10.3874/1538-4365/aab114.
  13. S. Zenitani and T. N. Kato, Multiple Boris Integrators for Particle-in-cell Simulation, Computer Physics Communications 247, 106954 (2020); doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106954.
  14. Y. Itikawa, Molecular Processes in Plasmas Collisions of Charged Particles with Molecules, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, (2007).
  15. J. S. Yoon, et. al., Cross Sections for Electron Collisions with Hydrogen Molecules, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 37, 2 (2008); doi: 10.1063/1.2838023.
  16. L. Brieda, Plasma Simulation by Example 1st Edition, CRC Press, 2020.
  17. T. Pang, An Introduction to Computational Physics Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  18. V. Vahedi and M. Surendra, A Monte Carlo Collision Model for The Particle-in-cell Method: Applications to Argon and Oxygen Discharges, Computer Physics Communications 87, (1995); doi: 10.1016/0010-4655(94)00171-W.
  19. J. P. Verboncoeur, Particle Simulation of Plasmas: Review and Advances, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 47, A231 (2005); doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/47/5A/017.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.55981/gnd.2023.6791

Copyright (c) 2024 GANENDRA Majalah IPTEK Nuklir

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
slot gacor slot