DESIGN OF HELICAL TYPE STEAM GENERATOR FOR EXPERIMENTAL POWER REACTOR

Sunny Ineza Putri, Prihadi Setyo Darmanto, Raden Mohammad Subekti

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.55981/tdm.2023.6656

Abstract


Reaktor Daya Eksperimental (RDE) is a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) for electricity generation, heat generation, and hydrogen production by Batan. Empirical and numerical calculations are needed to strengthen the existing design. The numerical method by computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analyzes temperature distribution and pressure drop along the pipe. The Batan RDE steam generator design has a seven-layer helical pipe model, while this research uses a one-layer helix pipe. In empirical calculations, the heat transfer region has three sections; single-phase liquid, two-phase, and single-phase vapor heat transfer. In numerical calculations, apply the assumption of constant heat flux and constant working fluid properties. The results of empiric calculations data showed that the helical pipe height was 3.98 m, shorter than the Batan design, which is 4.97 m. This considerable difference due to empirical calculations did not cover the safety factor. The results of numerical calculations show that in the single-phase, empiric calculation data were acceptable since the different values of numerical calculations for empiric calculations data were below 10%. Meanwhile, the case of the two-phase numerical calculations is not satisfactory and needs further research to obtain optimal results.

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. A. S. Ekariansyah, S. Widodo, H. Tjahjono, Susyadi, P. I. Wahyono, A. Budianto, Validation of Helical Steam Generator Design for the Experimental Power Reactor. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021. 1772(1):0–10.
  2. N. Jaffar, M. H. Inayat, A. N. K. Wardag, Design a Helical Coil Heat Exchanger Via CFD Simulations. Proc. 2017 14th Int. Bhurban Conf. Appl. Sci. Technol. IBCAST 2017. 2017.:594–8.
  3. X. Li, W. Gao, Y. Su, X. Wu, Thermal Analysis of HTGR Helical Tube Once Through Steam Generators using 1D and 2D methods. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2019. 355.
  4. M. U. Sikandar, Design of Helical Coil Heat Exchanger for a Mini Powerplant. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2019. 10(12):303–13.
  5. A. Kewin Titus, K. S. Khaja Fareedudeen Ahmed, P. Sabarish Kumar, D. Santhosh, Arun Vasantha Geethan K. Design and Analysis of Helical Coil Heat Exchanger. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020. 923(1).
  6. W. Chen, X. Fang, A Note on the Chen Correlation of Saturated Flow Boiling Heat Transfer. Int. J. Refrig. 2014. 48(1):100–4.
  7. U. E. Inyang, I. J. Uwa, Heat Transfer in Helical Coil Heat Exchanger. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2022. 12(01):26–39.
  8. P. C. Mukesh Kumar, M. Chandrasekar, CFD Analysis on Heat and Flow Characteristics of Double Helically Coiled Tube Heat Exchanger Handling MWCNT/Water Nanofluids. Heliyon. 2019. 5(7).
  9. K. V. K. Reddy, B. S. P. Kumar, R. Gugulothu, K. Anuja, P. V. Rao, CFD Analysis of a Helically Coiled Tube in Tube Heat Exchanger. Mater. Today Proc. 2017. 4(2):2341–9.
  10. M. Asghari, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, S. M. J. Mirzapour Al-E-Hashem, M. A. Dulebenets, Transformation and Linearization Techniques in Optimization: A State-of-the-Art Survey. MDPI Math. 2022. 10(2).
  11. G. Tommasone, Fouling and plate heat exchangers [Accessed: 16 August 2022]. Available from: https://heat-exchanger-world.com/featured-story-fouling-and-plate-heat-exchangers/#:~:text=While the addition of excess,the utility stream to be.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


PTKRN Digital Library Mendeley