ANALYSIS OF REACTIVITY INSERTION AS A FUNCTION OF THE RSG-GAS FUEL BURN-UP

Tukiran Surbakti, Surian Pinem, Lily Suparlina

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2021.23.1.6003

Abstract


Analysis of the control rod insertion is important as it is closely related to reactor safety. Previously, the analysis has been carried out in RSG-GAS during static condition, not as a function of the fuel fraction. The RSG-GAS reactor in one cycle is a function of the fuel burn-up. It is necessary to analyze RSG-GAS core reactivity insertion as a function of the fuel burn-up to determine the behavior of the reactor, especially in uncontrolled operations such as continuous pulling of control rods. This analysis is carried out by the computer simulation method using WIMSD-5B and MTR-DYN codes, by observing power behavior as a function of time due to neutron chain reactions in the reactor core. Calculations are performed using point kinetics equation, and the feedback effect will be evaluated using static power coefficient and fuel burn-up function. Analyzes were performed for the core configuration of the core no. 99, by lifting the control rod or inserting positive reactivity to the core. The calculation results show that with the reactivity insertion of 0.5% Δk/k at start-up power of 1 W and 1 MW, safety limit is not exceeded either at the beginning, middle, or end of the cycle. The maximum temperature of the fuel is 135°C while the safety limit is 180°C. The margin from the safety limit is large, and therefore fuel damage is not possible when power excursion were to occur.

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. Pinem S., Sembiring T.M., Surbakti T. Core Conversion Design Study of TRIGA Mark 2000 Bandung using MTR Plate Type Fuel Element. Int. J. Nucl. Energy Sci. Technol. 2018. 12(3):222-238.
  2. Surbakti T., Purwadi P. Analysis of Neutronic Safety Parameters of the Multi-Purpose Reactor–Gerrit Augustinus Siwabessy (RSG-GAS) Research Reactor at Serpong. J. Penelit. Fis. dan Apl. 2019. 9(1):78-91.
  3. Liem P.H., Surbakti T., Hartanto D. Kinetics Parameters Evaluation on the First Core of the RSG GAS (MPR-30) using Continuous Energy Monte Carlo Method. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 2018. 109:196–203.
  4. Dawahra S., Khattab K., Saba G. Extending the Maximum Operation Time of the MNSR Reactor. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2016. 115:256-261.
  5. Dawahra S., Khattab K., Saba G. Calculation and Comparison of Xenon and Samarium Reactivities of the HEU, LEU Core in the Low Power Research Reactor. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2015. 101:27-32.
  6. Surbakti T., Pinem S., Suparlina L. Dynamic Analysis on the Safety Criteria of the Conceptual Core Design in MTR-type Research Reactor. Atom Indones. 2018. 44(2):89-97.
  7. Surbakti T., Pinem S., Sembiring T.M., Hamzah A., Nabeshima K. Calculation of Control Rods Reactivity Worth of RSG-GAS First Core using Deterministic and Monte Carlo Methods. Atom Indones. 2019. 45(2):69-79.
  8. Pinem S., Sembiring T.M., Liem P.H. Neutronic and Thermal-hydraulic Safety Analysis for the Optimization of the Uranium Foil Target in the RSG-GAS Reactor. 2016. 42(3):123–128.
  9. Surbakti T., Pinem S., Sembiring T.M., Subekti M., Sunaryo G.R. Preliminary Study for Alternative Conceptual Core Design of the MTR Research Reactor. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018. 962:1-11.
  10. Hedayat A. Benchmarking Verification of the Control Rod Effects on the MTR Core Parameters using the MTR-PC and MCNP Codes throughout 3D Core Modeling and Rod-drop Experiment. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 2016. 88:183-190.
  11. Liu Z., Smith K., Forget B. Calculation of Multi-group Migration Areas in Deterministic Transport Simulations. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2020. 140:107-110.
  12. Wang C., Liu L., Liu M., Zhang D., Tian W., Qiu S., et al. Conceptual Design and Analysis of Heat Pipe Cooled Silo Cooling System for the Transportable Fluoride-salt-cooled High-temperature Reactor. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2017. 109:458-468.
  13. Pinem S., Liem P.H., Sembiring T.M., Surbakti T. Fuel Element Burnup Measurements for the Equilibrium LEU Silicide RSG GAS (MPR-30) Core under a New Fuel Management Strategy. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2016. 98:211-217.
  14. Villarino E.A., Mochi I. Thermal-hydraulic Models for Neutronic and Thermaly- hydraulic Feedback in Citvap Code. 2014. 33:23-36.
  15. Surbakti T., Imron M. Fuel Burn-up Calculation for Working Core of the RSG-GAS Research Reactor at Batan Serpong. J. Penelit. Fis. dan Apl. 2017. 7(2):89-101.
  16. Pinem S., Surbakti T., Sembiring T., et al. Optimization of Radioisotope Production at RSG-GAS Reactor using Deterministic Method. Journal Teknologi Indonesia. 2016. 1 (2):12-18.
  17. Valtavirta V., Leppänen J., Viitanen T. Coupled Neutronics–fuel Behavior Calculations in Steady State using the Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2017. 100:50-64.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


PTKRN Digital Library Mendeley